G6PD deficiency and diabetes

Today I follow an online trail to this article on diabetes from Nature Medicine here.

It is talking about a genetic variant that is found in people with African-American heritage called G6PDdef. This genetic pattern makes the HgbA1C test inaccurate. It will look low and “in control” even when blood sugars are high. Since the blood sugars are NOT in control, complications from diabetes can happen: damage to vision, to kidneys, to nerves in the hands and feet.

I have been reading articles about current and changing guidelines about diabetes. The current guidelines say that checking blood sugars at home doesn’t make a difference. I REALLY disagree with this and at the same time, I don’t think that physicians are approaching blood sugars in a practical manner.

I saw a man recently who is diagnosed with “insulin resistance”. His HgbA1C is in between 5.6 and 6.0. Normal is 4.5 to 5.6. Over 6.5 is diabetes. He has prediabetes. He has not checked blood sugars at all, but he is on metformin.

There is evidence that metformin is helpful, and still, I think it is putting the cart before the horse. I ask my people to go buy an over the counter glucometer. Ask for the one that has cheap strips, 6 for a dollar instead of a dollar apiece. Then we go over the normal and abnormal blood sugar ranges and I ask them to start checking blood sugars. If I give them a medicine right away, they don’t learn how to control their blood sugar with diet. ALL of my patients can figure out how to bring their blood sugars down with diet. If we can’t get to a good range, then we will add metformin. I do explain that the guidelines say use a medicine right away, but I ask, “Would you like to see if you can control your blood sugars with diet?” The answer is overwhelmingly “YES!” I have never had someone say no. If we do not give them the chance and explain the goals, why would they even try?

Also, I read the dietician handouts for diabetes yesterday and I am not satisfied. I do not think they explain carbohydrates well. Foods have fats, proteins, and carbohydrates, and anything that isn’t fat or protein has carbohydrates. I think of carbohydrates as a line, from ones with high fiber that do not send the blood sugar up fast, to ones that shoot it way high. At the low end is kale and lettuce and chard and celery. Then the green and yellow and red vegetables that are not sweet. Then beets and sweet peas. Next come the fruits, from blueberries up to much sweeter ones. Fruits overlap with grains: bread and pasta and potatoes and rice. The whole grains have more fiber and are slower to digest. Candy then sweet drinks (sodas are evil) and sugar.

Sugar has 15 grams of carbohydrate in a tablespoon. Kale has 7 grams of carbohydrate in a cup. That’s a pretty huge difference. A small apple has about 15 grams of carbohydrate and a large one 30 grams. Read labels for grains. There is a lot of carbohydrate in a small amount. The issue with fruit juice is that most of the fiber is gone, so the sugars are broken down and absorbed much faster. A 12 oz coke has 32 grams of carbohydrate and a Starbucks mocha has 62! I quit drinking the latter when I looked it up.

Most people with diabetes are supposed to stay at 30 grams of carbohydrate per meal, or 45 if it is a big person or if someone is doing heavy labor. Snacks are 15 grams.

Avocados are weird. They have about 17 grams of carbohydrate in a whole one, but they also have a lot of fat. They do have a lot of fiber, which surprises me.

Diet control takes a combination of paying attention to what is on the plate and serving amounts. Three servings of pasta is not going to work, unless you are out fighting forest fires or are on the swim team. Fire fighters are allotted 6000 calories a day, but most of us do not get that much exercise.

At the same time that articles are telling me that home blood sugars are not useful with a glucometer, everyone is pushing the continuous glucose monitors. I think we like technology. And other articles say that diabetes can be reversed with major lifestyle changes.

Articles: about not using home glucose checks, here. Starting metformin, here. Starting with one of the newer medicines, here.

I think people feel a lot more successful if they get a glucometer and can bring their blood sugar down by messing about with diet. I tell them to check after what they think is a “good” meal and after a “bad” one. How much difference is there? Contrast that with being handed a pill to control it, while someone talks about diet and says all the same stuff that we’ve heard for years. Nearly all of my people want to avoid more pills and are willing to try a glucometer to see if they can avoid a pill. People who have been on diabetes medicine for a while are less willing to try, but sometimes they do too. And sometimes they are surprised that some meals do not do good things for their blood sugar.

This is all type II diabetes. For type I, we have to have insulin. If type II has been out of control for a long time, sometimes those people have to have insulin too. Right now insurances will usually cover continuous glucose monitors for people with diabetes who are on insulin, both type I and II. I do hope that they really make a huge difference for those people!

The spectrum from the low carbohydrate vegetable, the green and yellow and orange ones, up to the really high simple sugar ones is also called the glycemic index. There are lists of low to high glycemic index foods. Perhaps some people with diabetes find that helpful, but I think it’s simpler to say, ok, the stuff that doesn’t taste sweet will send the blood sugar up less. Also, since we are all genetically different and then our gut bacteria and microbiome are all different, it is individualized care to say how does this person at this time respond to this food? We change over time!

There are other examples of the HgbA1C not working to track diabetes. A resident and I looked over a person with diabetes and spherocytosis. The HgbA1C was nearly normal but the blood sugars were in the 300 range. Spherocytosis is a genetic blood cell abnormality, and the red blood cells don’t live as long. People with a past bone marrow transplant also have red cells that live for a shorter time. The G6PD deficiency is thought to help people survive malaria, so persists in the population, like sickle cell anemia. Isn’t genetics fascinating?

Diabetes update

Friday I attended a Zoom diabetes update all day. Sigh. We are really doing diabetes wrong.

Diabetes affected every system in the body and so the guidelines want us to check everything. They made the point that controlled diabetes does NOT lead to blindness, kidney failure, and amputations. Only uncontrolled diabetes. There, do we feel better now?

There are three NEW things to check for. One is CHF, aka Congestive Heart Failure. Heart Failure is pump failure. It makes a lot more sense if you think of the heart as a pump. Diabetes doubles the risk of heart failure in men and increases it by five times in women. We are now to do a yearly BNP (Brain Natriuretic Peptide, got that?) except that it is useless if the person is in renal failure, because that raises it artificially.

The second NEW thing is liver problems. Liver failure is back in the top ten causes of death, having fallen off that list for a while. People drank more alcohol during COVID, there was more drug abuse adding to hepatitis B and C, but the biggest cause is NASH and NAFLD. More acronyms: NASH is Nonalchoholic Steatohepatitis and NAFLD is Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. This is related to overweight and obesity. Being overweight or obese messes up fat storage and over time this inflames the liver and then cells die, leading to cirrhosis. We are to watch liver tests, think about an ultrasound, and then there are two specific tests for cirrhosis.

Third NEW thing is Diabetes Distress. This is not depression. People score “depressed” on the PHQ-9 test, but don’t respond to anti-depressants. The lecturer said that we have to talk to the patient and find out why they are distressed, or what part of diabetes is getting them down. I thought that we should have been talking to the patient all along. There is a convenient 30 question tool we can use for this, if we have time. Will we?

Now, the old guidelines said that we are to check these things:

HgbA1C every 6 months if not on insulin, every 3 months on insulin and even more in pregnant patients.

Microalbumin/creatinine ratio: a urine test that tells us if the kidneys are starting to leak albumin. They shouldn’t.

Yearly eye test to check for diabetes damage.

Specific blood pressure ranges.

Keep everyone’s LDL cholesterol under 70. So nearly every person with diabetes gets a statin drug.

Do a foot check yearly for neuropathy.

So six things plus the new three. Can’t explain that in one visit and can’t do it in one visit either. I think we should revamp the Diabetes Distress tool and check if physicians and nurses have Guideline Distress. Diabetes is the most complicated set of guidelines other than pregnancy.

Diabetes also takes a lot of time for the person who has it. To check things “correctly”, it takes a minimum of two hours a day for Type II not on insulin and more like three or more for Type I and II on insulin. Think if you have to take two or three or more hours away from your current daily activities and devote it to diabetes. No wonder people are distressed.

The medicines are also confusing. Wegovy is in the same class as Ozempic, but is FDA approved only for weight loss in people who are overweight and have a complication, or people who are obese. Ozempic is for diabetes but people often lose weight so think about it if the person is overweight. Some of the medicines in that class also are approved to reduce the risk of heart disease, which goes up with diabetes. Another class has medicines some of which have approval for diabetes and others for diabetes and renal problems, BUT don’t use it if the eGFR is under 20, got that? The lecturer on medicines said that we’ll see less in each of those classes after they fight it out for dominance of the market. He’s been an endocrinologist for 30 years and remembers when the very first non-insulin medicine was approved. Cool! He is not discouraged, but another lecturer said that we have one endocrinologist for 5000 people with diabetes, which is not enough. We were encouraged to do more continuing medical education.

There is one guideline that I disagree with and would like to see changed. I will write about that next. After I memorize all of the different things the new medicines do, which is changing every month as new research comes out! Stay tuned!

I think I will put the clutch in and coast a bit. Or perhaps clutch handfuls of hair and pull at them, I don’t know.

For the Ragtag Daily Prompt: clutch.

I hiked again yesterday and had a very cooperative bunny stop for a snack in camera range.

A yarn about paper

On Friday in the morning I took notes on paper. I was attending a conference on diabetes on Zoom. There are three new things added to the diabetes guidelines. It is now impossible to do a visit about diabetes and actually talk to the human being who has diabetes. We’ll be too busy doing the stupid checklists.

The personnel person stopped by. I said I was taking notes. “On PAPER? You are killing me!”

“Ok. I will use yarn this afternoon.” I drove home and got my knitting and worked on a sock in the afternoon. All the clinics were having a slow day. I guess the kids are getting out of school and everyone is feeling good. Or panicked.

I retain as much information knitting as I do taking notes. Tactile-auditory learner and the controlled fidgeting of knitting helps me stay awake, retain information, and produce socks and others items. I wear the socks more than I reread the notes.

I still like paper. I keep a paper journal. I wanted notes from the most complex lecture. The new medicines are jockeying for position but right now there are different indications for each one, so it’s rather confusing. They said that Type II Diabetes takes two hours daily to manage “correctly”. And that Type I and Type II on insulin take 3 or more. We are supposed to check for Diabetes Distress, which is not depression, exactly. I think I need to be checked for Guideline Distress and Contact Diabetes Distress, sigh. At least the Diabetes Distress speaker thought we should talk to the patient, though I think the talking should have been long before that. Medicine in the US is a mess.

I used the back of the clinic schedules for notes. I do print it out daily. It’s to try to run on time. What time am I supposed to see the patient, but they can be up to 7 minutes late and then the medical assistant still has to “room” them (yes, room has been verbed). Then I can go see them. So the theoretical starting time and the actual starting time can vary quite a bit. I don’t feel bad about being twenty minutes late if I didn’t get to go in the room with the last patient until twenty minutes late. Maybe a no show will let me catch up. Or not.

Anyhow, I still like paper.

For the Ragtag Daily Prompt: paper.